Predicting and Analyzing Factors in Patent Litigation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Patent litigation is an expensive and time-consuming process. To minimize its impact on the participants in the patent lifecycle, automatic determination of litigation potential is a compelling machine learning application. In this paper, we consider preliminary methods for the prediction of a patent being involved in litigation using metadata, content, and graph features. Metadata features are top-level easily-extractable features, i.e., assignee, number of claims, etc. The content feature performs lexical analysis of the claims associated to a patent. Graph features use relational learning to summarize patent references. We apply our methods on US patents using a labeled data set. Prior work has focused on metadata-only features, but we show that both graph and content features have significant predictive capability. Additionally, fusing all features results in improved performance. We also perform a preliminary examination of some of the qualitative factors that may have significant importance in patent litigation.
منابع مشابه
Analysis of the Relationship between Patent Litigation and Citation: Subdivision of Citations
Recent examples of patent litigation show the evidence of firms strategic patent use. Thus forecasting patent litigation becomes a greater priority. Patent citations have been prevalent in its usage in analyzing business environment as diverse patent indicators or a tool to predict patent litigation. However, most previous research has considered only direct patent citations. In order to overco...
متن کاملStylized Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership
This paper investigates the characteristics of litigated patents by combining for the firsttime information about patent case filings from the U.S. district courts and detailed datafrom the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We construct a series of indicators for thefactors which the theoretical literature suggests contribute to litigation: frequency ofdisputes, the size and asy...
متن کاملWho's Afraid of the Patent Trolls? Assessing the Market Impact of Landmark Patent Troll Litigation Outcomes
Patent trolls have changed the innovation and patent policy landscape. This thesis is an empirical event study that focuses on two landmark cases of patent troll litigation, RIM v. NTP and eBay v. Mercexchange, to determine whether pro-troll litigation outcomes significantly impact the market values of the firms in the high-tech industries they target. I find that the Supreme Court ruling in eB...
متن کاملThe Rise of Contingent Fee Representation in Patent Litigation
It is well known that plaintiff-side contingent representation is on the rise in patent litigation. But why? And what are the lawyers in the field like? Although scholars have studied contingent litigation in other contexts — such as medical malpractice, personal injury, and products liability litigation — patent litigation has received almost no attention. This gap in the literature is unsettl...
متن کاملResearch on Patent Information Analyzing and Predicting System Based on Data Mining
Patents, as technological innovation achievements and sign, are potential and intangible assets of enterprises and can enhance their core competitiveness. How to obtain useful information and knowledge from a large number of patents data, have become an urgent problem. In order to satisfy the actual needs of enterprises for patent information, the paper proposed a frame of patent information an...
متن کامل